Wednesday, January 18, 2006

New York Times editorial on the smearing of veterans

Well worth reading.

IT should come as no surprise that an arch-conservative Web site is questioning whether Representative John Murtha, the Pennsylvania Democrat who has been critical of the war in Iraq, deserved the combat awards he received in Vietnam.

After all, in recent years extremist Republican operatives have inverted a longstanding principle: that our combat veterans be accorded a place of honor in political circles. This trend began with the ugly insinuations leveled at Senator John McCain during the 2000 Republican primaries and continued with the slurs against Senators Max Cleland and John Kerry, and now Mr. Murtha.

Military people past and present have good reason to wonder if the current administration truly values their service beyond its immediate effect on its battlefield of choice. The casting of suspicion and doubt about the actions of veterans who have run against President Bush or opposed his policies has been a constant theme of his career. This pattern of denigrating the service of those with whom they disagree risks cheapening the public's appreciation of what it means to serve, and in the long term may hurt the Republicans themselves.

Not unlike the Clinton "triangulation" strategy, the approach has been to attack an opponent's greatest perceived strength in order to diminish his overall credibility. To no one's surprise, surrogates carry out the attacks, leaving President Bush and other Republican leaders to benefit from the results while publicly distancing themselves from the actual remarks.

The editorial, written by James Webb, a former Marine platoon and company commander in Vietnam, goes on to note the links between Cybercast News Service and the Republican party, as well as to point out just how specious the questioning of Murtha's service is.


John Lombard said...

Of course, Clinton's triangulation strategy was to adopt, not to attack.

Hume's Ghost said...

You know, Alterman brings up a good point today on his blog in his post about this and the state dept. memo.

He links to a prediction by John Diulio - the guy who got backed down by the White House for his Mayberry Machieavelli comment) who predicts the media at large will continue to harp on a red state blue state culture war while they ignore the interesting in-party battle that is going on with the Republicans.