While I had pointed out that David Bellamy's scientific assertions were b.s. I didn't really look into his claims about his being silenced because of his dissent on global warming (although I was skeptical.) Deltoid points out that Bellamy's victimization assertion is bogus, too.
Bellamy had implied that since 1996 he was being denied tv appearances and programs because of an article he wrote on global warming - but that paper didn't come out until 2004, and Bellamy believed in global warming at least until 2001! Also, while Bellamy is now attributing his status to his views on AGW and windfarms, he had previously in 2002 attributed it to his opposition to the election of John Major.